Prosecutors at R. Kelly's child pornography trial on Thursday replayed the sex tape at the center of the case for jurors, who for three weeks have heard family members of the alleged victim, basketball coaches, forensics experts and others testify as to the identity of the participants.

Prosecutors, who played the tape as part of bother their opening and closing arguments, told jurors that the man is Kelly, and that the R&B superstar controlled the encounter with an underage female as young as 13.

"We're going to see his direction," Assistant State's Attorney Shauna Boliker said. He is "directing her to dance, where to stand, when to stop urinating," she said.

Kelly denies that the man in the video is him.

At one point in the video, entered into evidence as "People's Exhibit No. 1," the female dances and urinates on the floor — the man out of view. Back in view, he has sex with her. In one scene near the end of the video, alluded to in one count of the indictment, the man urinates on the female.

The month long trial has centered on whether Kelly is the man who appears on the 27-minute videotape, and whether a female who also appears on it is underage.

advertisement

Kelly, 41, has pleaded not guilty to 14 counts of child pornography. Both he and the alleged victim, now 23, deny being on the tape and neither testified at trial.

Defense attorney Sam Adam Jr. told jurors that charges against Kelly came about because people were trying to extort money from the Grammy winner because the man on the tape "may favor him."

"That's what this is about — money, money, money," Adam said.

He also suggested that prosecutors pressured people into testifying against Kelly.

Over seven days presenting their case, prosecutors called 22 witnesses, including several childhood friends of the alleged victim and four of her relatives who identified her as the female on the video. Some said she had referred to Kelly as her "godfather."

In just two days, Kelly's lawyers called 12 witnesses. They included three relatives of the alleged victim who testified they did not recognize her as the female on the tape.

Adam said that the alleged victim's relatives know it's not her on the video because "any solid man in that family, any solid woman in that family would have gone over there and broken his legs, would have gone over there and beat the crap out of him."

The family also would have gotten an order of protection against Kelly, but none of that happened, Adam said.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------