WHAT IS WRONG WITH POLYGAMY?
Sometime in October last year, at around 11pm, as I was about to retire to
bed, my cell phone rang. As I picked up to answer the call, it was a
female voice. The caller is a professional colleague of mine who is in her
early thirties and African-American. My heart skipped a bit as I was
wondering whether there was a problem in the office which she wanted to
warn me about or whether I took a wrong file home.“Is everything ok?” I
asked. “Oh yes, everything is fine. I apologize to you for calling you
this late in the night, hope you wouldn’t mind, I have been trying to
reach you all day” she said. I heaved a sigh of relief, but I could feel
the excitement on the other side of the line. She went on to the aim of
calling me and told me that as she went to braid her hair in an African
Hair Salon, there was this movie that was showing titled: “ Atlanta ”. She
gave me the details of the movie which involved a man that married another
wife who happened to be his daughter’s best friend. She told me that when
she was watching the movie, she remembered me. Still confused, I inquired,“So you called me this time of the night to tell me about the movie you
watch at some African Hair Salon?”“No I was just wondering if it is true.I have 2 questions for you. Is it true that in Africa, men marry as many
wives as they want? Secondly, could you help me buy the Part II of the
movie, I really want to watch the second part” She went on again telling
me what she thought would happen in the second part of the movie. As she
was engaged in the monologue, I was laughing my lungs out. When she
finished, she asked again, “please tell me the truth; is it true?” I
started laughing again. “Why are you laughing at me?” She inquired. 'So
that’s why you want to take 30 minutes off my sleep time? So you thought I
was playing when I told you that I already had 9 wives”.“You are not
serious. You are always funny. But I’m curious, is it possible for someone
to marry many wives in Nigeria? I spent about another 30 minutes lecturing
her about the issue of marrying more than one wife and about its benefits
and shortcomings. At the end I said to her: “Well, since you have taking
away portion of my sleep time, in my culture, if a single lady calls and
spoke to a man at this time of the night, it means something. I’ve been
wondering all along, will you be my 10th wife? Number 10 in my culture
gets the best of everything from the husband, so will you be my magic
number 10?”“Goodbye, I will see you in the office tomorrow” and she hung
up. This issue of polygamy and the attendant problems has been a topic
that many writers refuse to take head-on. The topic is controversial and
many people view polygamists with disdain. Some see them as heathens or
traditionalists.
To some, polygamists are pagans, or as they put it, idol
worshippers.In this article, I wish to take this issue to the market
square and ventilate the pros and cons in the public, so that people that
do not understand African way of life and the complexities of our
traditions will come to understand and maybe appreciate why it is so.
Also, it is meant for even some Africans themselves that condemn the
practice and refer to men that marry more than one wife as crude or living
in the past. But I am here to tell readers that men that marry more than
one wife are not crude. The term “polygamy” is Greek word meaning “the
practice of multiple marriages”. It is a form of marriage in which a
person has more than one spouse. It is the opposite of monogamy which is a
practice of one man one wife. Polygamy is divided into two, polygyny and
polyandry. Polygyny means when a man marries more than one wife at a time.
Polygyny is practiced in many Middle Eastern and some African countries
like Sudan and some Western African countries especially Muslims and
traditional religion. It is also practiced in the Caribbean in mostly
patriarchical societies. Mormon religion used to practice it but later
outlawed it except that their fundamentalists still practice it. Polyandry
means when a woman marries more than one husband at a time. In some
cultures, it is not uncommon for women to marry more than one husband at a
time. It is known as wife sharing. Some call it fraternal polyandry and it
was traditionally practiced among nomadic Tibetans in Nepal and some parts
of China . There, two or more brothers share the same wife, with the wife
having equal sexual access to them.
Polyandry is mainly practiced in
societies with scarce environmental resources, as it is believed to limit
human population growth and enhance child survival. They reasoned that a
child with more than one father has a more chance of survival than a child
with only one father. Here we mean social fathers and not necessarily
biological fathers. Some people will roll their eyes at this notion, but
culture is relative to the people that practice it (cultural relativism).
Therefore it is a misnomer to use the term polygamy as involving a man
marrying more than one wife at a given time. It is actually
polygyny.Having said that let me say that the practice of one man marrying
many wives to me is not by itself wrong. In the olden days, our grand
fathers and great-grand fathers practiced it because of many reasons. First
of all the practice is highly favored because of the agrarian society of
their time. Many wives equal many children and many children together with
the many wives accounted for many hands in the farm. The more people you
have in your family the more laborers in your farmland. The mainstay of
their economy is farming. A man’s wealth is judged by the size of his farm
and by how big his family is. People also look at how much land, fruit
trees like palm trees and other economic trees. In my area when yam is the
most common stable food, people look at the size of the barn, to see how
many stacks of yams, the quantity of cocoyam etc.
All these are
indicatives of how wealthy a man is at their time. Let me say that a poor
man would not be able to cater for many wives and does not have big farms.
Moreover, some men that grew up as only sons, try to take many wives so as
to enlarge the size of his family.Secondly, a man’s family size determines
his influence in the political society. With his many wives and children,
his political influence could be felt. This is because, in the public
square, if the man has grown sons that have already been initiated into
the age-grade “ogbo”, if the man makes a suggestion and a hand vote is
needed, his grown sons would be there to back him up. Also some men that
want to be “eze”-kings, try to take wives from villages in his town that
he sees as his rival in the chieftaincy tussle. If he foresees that there
is a prospective candidate for “eze” from certain village(s), a
politically savvy candidate would try to take a wife from that village(s)
to neutralize his rival(s). That way, if his rivals want to hurt him, they
would not because he is now an “ogo” in-law. Some men even when they have
already succeeded in becoming “ezes”, if they still feel threatened by a
particular village, they try to take wives from those villages to
neutralize any move by them to antagonize him since he is now a ‘relation’
to them by virtue of marriage.In some instances, many wives were products
of inter-tribal wars. In those days, some women captured during
inter-tribal wars automatically become wives of the king. Some were given
to him as spoils of war or in agreement to appease the victors during
those wars.Sometimes, if there was an accidental killing of a man, the
culprits would pay the victim’s family with a young woman in compensation
for their loss. The young woman would become a wife of the deceased person
and probably the eldest person in the family would “inherit” the young
woman and raise children for the deceased brother. Also if a man dies and
the wife is still young, his brother also inherits the wife and raise kids
for his deceased brother. In Jewish tradition, it is called levirate
marriage. In these instances, these men add to the number of wives they
have.The down side is that in a polygamous marriage, there is this
constant competition among the wives and even children of opposing camps.
They compete for everything from the husbands' time, attention, wealth,
etc. Sometimes, this competition becomes deadly as there is always
constant bickerings, fights, enmity and back-bitting. These are not
unexpected in a place where you have lots of interests. If a person
marries another spouse while the first legal marriage is still subsisting,
he commits a crime known as bigamy. Bigamy is defined as the act or
condition of a person marrying another person while still being lawfully
married to a third person. It is a crime in most western countries. For
instance in the United States, married persons make a contract upon
becoming married and by that contract, the person is obliged under the law
not to marry again as long as the first marriage continues and the
stipulations of the marriage license applies.
According to Section 370 of
the Criminal Code, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1990: “Any person
who, having a husband or wife living, marries in any case in which such
marriage is void by reason of its taking place during the life of such
husband or wife, is guilty of felony and is liable for imprisonment for 7
years” In Nigeria, if one performs marriage under the Marriage Act, any
other subsequent marriage(s) under the Act is bigamy. Marriage under the
Act means that there was a marriage protected by the law whereby the
spouse has certain rights and privileges. However, what many do in order
to circumvent the provision of the Criminal Code as regards bigamy, is to
perform one marriage under the Marriage Act and the other subsequent ones
under the traditional system. But even before a particular marriage is
performed under the Marriage Act, the traditional marriage must be
performed. That gives the suitor some standing to proceed with the church
marriage. Before a priest performs a wedding for a couple, or even before
the marriage ban is called in the church, the suitor must have performed
the vital aspect of the traditional marriage which in most cases is the
bride price or bride wealth (ime ego nwanyi or ime aku nwanyi) as some
call it. Otherwise, there would be objections by the bride’s family. I
would say that though polygamy is frowned at by the law, I have not seen
someone being prosecuted for bigamy in African setting. The only thing is
that it is only the “legal” wife and his children that has a right to the
man’s property should there be any lawsuit especially if the man dies
intestate (without making a will). The law is not so strict against men
that have many wives irrespective of the fact that subsequent wives are
not recognized by the law.One wonders the essence of the law of bigamy. In
other words, what did the law of bigamy set out to achieve or to prevent?
Is it to protect the sanctity of marriage? Which sanctity? Or is it saying
that Africans do not understand what marriage is? If a man already has
some mistresses by the side, then there is no sanctity to protect anymore
since the man has already violated his marital vows. My take is that if
the law is really set out to punish men because they marry more than one
wife, it is immaterial that the subsequent wives do not have marriage
certificates. If it could be shown that a marriage ceremony took place by
furnishing both documentary evidence in form of pictures, Traditional
Marriage Invitation Cards; and producing witnesses of the ceremony, then a
prima facie case of bigamy is made out. Prosecution for bigamy should then
follow. So my question is if the law is watered down as far as bigamy is
concerned, why then is polygamy frowned at and why is the law of bigamy
still in effect. Polygamy is not part of the practices that are “repugnant
to natural law equity and good conscience” as was handed down to the
colonial administrator by their superiors. It is submitted that the law of
bigamy is no longer good law and ought to be purged out of our legal
system since our socio-economic reality does not even support it.
So the
law of bigamy is superfluous.I think the law of bigamy has been overtaken
by event. To take the words of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., an American
Jurist, in his book: The Path of the Law (10 Harv. L. Rev. 456, 459 (1897)“It is revolting to have no better reason for the rule of law than that
so it was laid down in the time of Henry IV. It is still more revolting if
the grounds upon which it was laid down have vanished long since, and the
rule simply persists from blind imitation of the past”. I do not think
that it is the government’s business to invade the citizens’ right of
personal privacy, freedom of thought, religion and conscience as enshrined
in the First Amendment or Sections 37 and 38 of the 1999 Constitution of
the Federal Republic of Nigeria.Every citizen should have a right to marry
as many wives as he could cater for. The Muslim religion recognizes
polygyny as many as four wives. The curious thing is that even though
Christianity frowns at polygyny, nowhere was it outlawed in the bible. The
Hebrew Bible shows that polygyny was practiced by the ancient Hebrews.
Though practice was not very common, it was not particularly unusual and
was certainly not prohibited or even discouraged by the bible.There is
nowhere in the Torah (Jewish sacred writings and teachings mostly on a
scroll) or the rest of the bible where monogamy was established as a rule
or even laid out as a sanctioned principle. In the bible, there are about
forty polygynists, including the prominent ones as Abraham, Jacob, Esau,
Moses, David and even Solomon, with little or no further remark on their
status as polygynist.The Torah and even the Five Books of Moses, include a
few specific regulations on the practice. In the bible, Exodus 21:10
states that multiple marriages are not to diminish the status of the first
wife, while Deuteronomy 21: 15-17 states that a man must award the
inheritance due to a first-born son to the son who was actually born
first, even if he hates that son’s mother and likes another wife more.
This implies that the son’s hated mother might have been divorced. Again,
Deuteronomy 17: 17 states that the king shall not have too many wives.The
levirate marriage, (derived from the latin word “levir”, meaning“husband’s brother” is a type of marriage in which a woman marries one of
her husband’s brother after her husband’s death, if there were no
children, in order to continue the line of the dead husband) has a
positive disposition towards polygyny.
The institution requires a man to
marry and support his deceased brother’s widow if he died without having
given birth to a son. (Deut. 25: 5-10). Also Leviticus 18:18 was
interpreted to mean that a man can only take a second wife if his first
wife gives her consent. Also in Exodus 21:10 a man can only take a second
wife if he is capable of maintaining same level of the marital duties of
food, clothing and sexual gratification as are due to the first wife. So
because of these considerations, polygyny is considered impractical both
to the Jews and to the Igbos. However, the Hebrews bible forbids
polyandry. Hence, for a woman to have sexual relations when she is married
to another would constitute adultery, with the consequences that it would
have on her status and that of her children from that “adulterous”
relationship. The Igbo culture also forbids polyandry. If a man marries
more than one wife, it is called polygyny, however, if a woman does same
thing it is not called “polyandry” but “adultery”. Even if she only talks
about doing it, she is considered an adulterous and wayward woman. That’s
how lucky women are in our society.Christianity does not explicitly ban
polygyny. New Testament does not explicitly mention or outlaw polygamy,
however, verses that teach about leadership, forbid multiple marriage for
only church leaders. According to 1 Timothy 3:2, “a bishop must be
blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behavior,
given to hospitality, apt to teach” while 1 Corinthians 7:2 says that“each man is to have his own wife, and each woman her own
husband”.Christianity for over 1,000 years has been in favor of “one man
one wife” and most Christian philosophers support this position. According
to St. Augustine in his book titled: “The Good of Marriage” (Chapter 15)“Although it was lawful among the ancient fathers: whether it be lawful
now also, I would not hastily pronounce. For there is not now necessity of
begetting children, as there then was, when , even when wives bear
children, it was allowed, in order to a more numerous posterity, to marry
other wives in addition, which now is certainly not lawful.”St. Augustine
saw a conflict between the Roman Civil Law and the Old Testament as
regards polygyny but he did not consider it in violation of the
scriptures.The Catholic Catechism taught that:“polygamy is not in accord
with the moral law. Conjugal communion is radically contradicted by
polygamy; this, in fact, directly negates the plan of God which was
revealed from the beginning, because it is contrary to the equal personal
dignity of men and women who in matrimony give themselves with a love that
is total and therefore unique and exclusive” (see the Vatican Website)
This is also a normal position among Protestant Churches. This means that
the mainstream Christian position is to reject polygamy in principle.
However, during the Protestant Reformation, Martin Luther was known to
have granted the Langrave Philip of Hesse, (a leading champion of the
Reformation and one of the most important German rulers of the Renaissance
who for years had been living “constantly in a state of adultery and
fornication”) a dispensation to take a second wife.
The said marriage was
to be done in secret to avoid public scandal. Even fifteen years earlier,
and in a letter to the Saxon Chancellor Gregor Bruck, Luther stated that
he could not “forbid a person to marry several wives, for it does not
contradict the scriptures”(See generally Wikipedia, the free
encyclopaedia) Even now, many people I know that are devoted to the church
and wanted to receive holy communion are allowed to do so, provided that
they denounce all their wives except one that they would take to the alter
with. The church turns a blind eye to whatever happens between the man and
the other wives that are not recognized by the church. How about the
children begotten by these “rejected women”?Many people just rejoice over
the fact that they are the wedded wife and that she has more rights than
the other women. That may be true but in our traditional society and in
practice, every child in the marriage has their own right in their
father’s property. So it is just a matter of “feel good” or psychology or
just the bragging right of being called the legal wife. The society would
not allow a man to disown his kids whether their mother was taken to the
altar or not or whether or not their mother was taken to the court to
perform court marriage.The church and the law recognize that in our
African society, it is not possible to order a man to remain with one
wife. The peculiar situations in Africa would make it impracticable for
some men not to take a second wife. For instance, I know some men that are
only sons in their families, got married to beget children especially male
children, but unfortunately, were only able to have one male child or no
male child. Some of them would be forced to marry again so that his
lineage would not terminate. Some would resist the pressure from the
family members, but would later succumb to the pressure. In this case, I
am not talking about your average primitive and uneducated one, there are
cases where you see a well-educated and “polished” men who even studied
abroad, but when faced with the reality of life, succumb to the wishes of
what society expects. There are some men that prefer large family. They
just want to see kids everywhere in his house. Some do it out to personal
preferences.The society of today is being constrained by the law of
bigamy. Again I would argue against this law.
In our society today,
divorce is on the increase. In American society today, court is flooded
with divorce petitions. Even among Nigerians and other African living
abroad, divorce rate is on the increase. It is estimated that six in every
ten marriages or 60% of marriages among Nigerians living abroad is likely
to fail. See the articles written on the topic by the author:http://nigeriaworld.com/articles/2006/sep/242.htmlhttp://nigeriaworld.com/articles/2006/dec/124.html The recurring reason for divorce in America is marital infidelity by
either party. Research shows that men are more likely to cheat on their
wives than women. Taking all these together means that men are more
polygamous in nature than woman. Let us be real about this and tell
ourselves the truth. Which is better: to have more than one wife fully
recognized and accorded all her rights or to have one wife with
uncountable mistresses or concubines? What is going on in the society
today shows that sexual immorality is on the increase, no thanks to the
computer/internet age. There are lots children outside wedlock or inside
the closet, what happens to their psychology of being rejected by their
biological fathers. Also sexually transmitted diseases are on the
increase. So why not bring the mistresses home and accord them same
respect and status as ‘legal’ wives. We have many women roaming around
without husbands to call their own or to be co-owners. It is outdated and
a misnomer in our modern society to say that women are chattels of their
husbands. We have women that have reached the apex of their careers but
their life is not complete and our society does not accord them any status
or respect because they are not married. Some women even sponsor their own
wedding since their spouse cannot afford to even pay their bride price.
Our society value women that are on top as regards their profession; but
only when marriage is icing in the cake of those achievements. Some modern
women are no longer worried about the quality of their husbands. Before,
they would make the laundry list of qualities they want in their Mr.
Right; but now since they could not get even half of those qualities from
one person, the have no choice than to lower the bar. That is the reality
of life. I have seen some ladies that grew up in a well-to-do family, had
quality education and currently work in big banks, oil companies,
communication industries, stock brokerages, and even managers in big
corporation or government establishments, yet they are not married because
the standard they set for their ideal men is too high to achieve. Now some
even get some men and try to brush them up to reach that acceptable
standard. Some even get married to please the society whether or not they
are happy in the marriage, just to change their status from “single” to“married” even though they would do whatever they want as the so-called
husband could not exert any amount of control over them. Some even keep
themselves from buying cars or buying expensive properties, thinking that
it would drive men away from them. So who would marry all these high
performing ladies? With economic realities of our time, men cannot even
afford to get married, let alone marry more than one wife. Still there are
some that are very wealthy.They are the ones, some of which have retinue
of mistresses and concubines since they have money to throw about. They
are the ones that I suggest should marry more than one wife if, apart from
their economic power, they have the maturity, judgment and psychological
stability that go with the polygynous family. If a man has four wives, and
contemplates purchasing a BMW car for one, he better be sure that he can
afford four BMW cars or better cars for all the wives. Also if wants to
purchase a house in Ikoyi or Victoria Island, he must be able to buy four
houses for his four brides, otherwise he would be courting disaster. There
was a highly educated lady I discussed with about this issue of polygamy
and what she said shocked me. She was as honest as she was blunt. She told
me that “all men are dogs; forget all these good boy look of some”! She
told me that she has been privileged to have the confidence of older and
more mature men who took her as their confidant. She told me that these
men told her in all honesty, that there is 80% chance that her future
husband would cheat on her repeatedly and that the earlier she gets
accustomed to that fact of life, the better for her. She told me that they
even told her that all men cheat on their wives but the degree of cheating
between one man and another is what makes the difference. Though I totally
disagree with her, I admit that there are some elements of truth but that
80% is very high and staggering figure.
Though they are in the minority,
some women do not find it strange that a man would have more than one
wife. Some even are open to the idea of being married to a polygynous man.
In fact, a lady was telling about a friend of hers that was a third wife
of a certain rich man. She told me that her friend was living happily as
she has her own house, car and houseboys/maids “ministering” to her. Asked
about her opinion about that, she told me that she has no problems with
that as long as she gets her own due. The only problem, according to her
is if she does not have equal access to the man as would the other wives.
She told me that she prefers that her husband brings the mistresses out in
the open and marry them so that she would know who her official
competitors are. Also that way, instead of one pair of eye watching the
man’s moves, it would be, say 3 or four pair of eyes.So my take is if men
or even women could be married several times and be divorced the same
amount of times, why not keep all of them together since one cannot get
everything from a particular woman or man. If a woman can get married to
three men at the same time, I do not see the reason why the law would tell
her no. The only problem is that in most African society, I do not see a
woman that would have the courage to do same or even a man that would be
so cheap to be husband #2 or #3. I don’t see a family that would encourage
their daughter to marry more than one husband let alone be involved in
polyandry. No matter how exposed or educated a woman is, polyandry is
adultery in my culture. Abomination some would say!Solomon in his wisdom
had seven hundred wives and three hundred concubines (1 King 11:3) but in
our foolishness, our law sticks to one man, one wife. Though they turned
his heart away from the Lord, it was not because of their number but
because they are from other tribes and worshipped other gods. In
conclusion, I think that the law of bigamy and the prohibition against
polygamy is no longer a good law since whatever condition it was meant to
solve or arrest is no longer relevant. Prohibition of polygamy has no
authority in the bible and Christians should be left with their
conscience. People should be free to make their own independent decision
as to what kind of marriage they want. It is not the business of the
government to dictate people's personal lives. So knowing the advantages
and disadvantages of polygamous family, it is up to the person to know
what is good for him. To paraphrase what our great Chinua Achebe would say
'he who wants to swallow an apple ('udala') seed would first of all go and
inspect the size of his anus.' *Chukwudi Nwokoye writes from Maryland,
USA, and can be reached at nwokoyeac@hotmail.com
By
Chukwudi
Nwokoye
Esq.